Author Archives: Andrew
			
	
  			
							
			
                            
            
				
								Apologies to regular readers who wondered if I’d fallen off the planet. It’s been a busy second half of 2005, and I haven’t managed to do much reading or writing for a few months. However, with the builders gone and a very difficult year over, hopefully things will get back to more nearly normal!
Sorry, there’s no Coppertrees Calendar for 2006 – another casualty of our very busy 2005. Hopefully it will make a return in 2007.I’m currently working on a new paper, looking at the different ways of modelling dependencies in software. I’m hoping it’s possible to merge some of the matrix-based techniques with pattern-based approaches – watch this space for more details.A very Happy New Year to all my readers. Here’s hoping that we’ll all have a slightly easier 2006.
				
							 
		
	
	
			
		 
		
	  
  
  
  	
		
        				I don’t really believe in a common architectural process. As the author of a successful project management book, and recent articles on data architecture methods, I probably shouldn’t say this, but to paraphrase a famous quote, “When I hear ‘process’,  Continue reading →
				
	 
  
  
  	
		
        				Almost all integration projects contain one or more transformations (sometimes called “mappings”) between two different structures holding equivalent data (for example the order tables in the database, and the order XML message). We know how to model the individual static  Continue reading →
				
	 
  
  
  	
		
        				I’ve just posted my review of Bill Bryson’s “A Short History of Nearly Everthing”. I found it an excellent holiday read, athough a general science book with almost no illustrations or equations took a bit of getting used to. For  Continue reading →
				Tuesday, August 16, 2005 in 
Reviews, 
Thoughts on the World 
	 
  
  
  	
  
  
  	
		
        				There’s been a lot of talk in recent years about a “city planning” metaphor for Enterprise Architecture development. Pat Helland’s article “Metropolis” in the Microsoft Architecture Journal is a very good example (see my post on this for some key  Continue reading →
				
	 
  
  
  	
		
        				A bit of a change from my more serious posts, but maybe a useful lesson in analysis, here’s the sorry tale of just how complicated I managed to make listing my top ten favourtite films. I hope it gives you  Continue reading →
				
	 
  
  
  	
		
        				I’ve just posted my review of Gregor Hohpe and Bobby Woolfe’s excellent book on Enterprise Integration using messaging, “Enterprise Integration Patterns”. Overall it’s an excellent book, and wiil probably become a “bible” for those involved in the high-level design of  Continue reading →
				
	 
  
  
  	
  
  
  	
		
        				Please forgive me if this sounds like a rant, but I’m very annoyed. Someone who should know better has without warning changed a public interface, with the inevitable effect that dependent systems, in particular my blog, have broken. The offender?  Continue reading →
				Monday, July 18, 2005 in 
Thoughts on the World 
	 
  
  
  	
		
        				I’ve just read an excellent paper by Pat Helland of Microsoft, in which he likens the development of cities and manufacturing in the 19th century to the development of systems and business models now. His conclusion – IT at the  Continue reading →
				
	 
  
  
  	
		
        				Does anybody know if Microsoft have killed off their Architecture Journal? I was just about to write a post linking to it, and I find the content has been moved to an archive area and all the links have changed.  Continue reading →